Reproducibility in Research, a practical guide (2/3): A workflow for a Reproducible Research

This post was originally published on Medium.

Read the full article on Medium

This guide took roots from the ethos of Open Science. In the first post of this three-part series on reproducibility in academic research, I argued that FAIR principles and stable computational environments are essential to a reproducible research. The current post delves into building a practical research workflow that relies on stable computational environments and adheres to FAIR principles.

As a disclaimer, I make a distinction between reproducibility and replicability. For a more precise look at what reproducibility means, Nature has dedicated in 2018 a special archive on the Challenges in Irreproducible Research. For technical aspects, you...




Enjoy Reading This Article?

Here are some more articles you might like to read next:

  • Coming soon
  • The public sphere is not a collection of echo chambers
  • Neuroscience 2035: What the next decade looks like
  • Can machines think? 2.0
  • The mind, the brain and the network
  • Intelligence is easy; cognition is hard
  • Better Judgments: What good judgments are missing
  • Better Judgments: How AI forecasting abilities will reshape human metacognition
  • Neuroscience 2035: The future of neuroscience is integrative
  • Three point five days to forecast March Madness